Be legally wise: when is parental consent required for adolescents' access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)?

SOURCE: Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine
OUTPUT TYPE: Journal Article
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2020
TITLE AUTHOR(S): A.Strode, C.M.Slack, Z.Essack, J.D.Toohey, L.G.Bekker
KEYWORDS: ADOLESCENTS, HIV/AIDS, HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV)
DEPARTMENT: Human and Social Capabilities (HSC)
Print: HSRC Library: shelf number 11619
HANDLE: 20.500.11910/15506
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/15506

Download this report

If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact Hanlie Baudin at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za.

Abstract

South African adolescents (12-17 years) need an array of prevention tools to address their risk of acquiring the life-long, stigmatized condition that is HIV. Prevention tools include pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). However, service providers may not be clear on the instances where self-consent is permissible or when parental consent should be secured. To consider the legal norms for minor consent to PrEP using the rules of statutory interpretation. Legal and policy framework. We find that PrEP should be interpreted as a form of 'medical treatment'; understood broadly so that it falls within the ambit of one of consent norms in the Children's Act. When PrEP is interpreted as 'medical treatment', then self-consent to PrEP is permissible for persons over 12 years, if they have the mental capacity and maturity to understand the benefits, risks, social and other implications of the proposed treatment. Currently, PrEP is only licensed for persons over 35 kg. Reaching the age of 12 years is a necessary but not sufficient criteria for self-consent and service-providers must ensure capacity requirements are met before implementing a self-consent approach. Decisional support and adherence support are critical. We recommend that service-providers should take steps to ensure that those persons who meet an age requirement for self-consent, also meet the capacity requirement, and that best practices in this regard be shared. We also recommend that policy makers should ensure that PrEP guidelines are updated to reflect the adolescent consent approach articulated above. It is envisaged that these efforts will enable at-risk adolescents to access much needed interventions to reduce their HIV risk.